- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 14:58:28 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 27/12/2016 14:10, Jeff Jaffe wrote: >> I therefore think that ISSUE-176 can be closed, at least for now. > > While I agree with your conclusion (that this may not need a change in > process), I don't think we should close the issue without a thorough > discussion in the Process CG. Clearly there are those who feel that a > process change is needed, and I think we need to hear them out. > > It would seem very odd to me if the way we respond to people who are > saying: "you are making decisions without talking to me first" - is to > close their issue without thoroughly hearing their proposals and > discussing with them. Thanks. And I am surprised to see a request to close issue 176 before my change proposal is posted here. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2016 13:59:01 UTC