- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:42:35 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 16/12/2016 18:24, David Singer wrote: > I assume (until we cut over to GitHub) you should raise an Issue. Done; issue 176. > do you have a pointer? it’s nice to have a “test case” or example Last CSS WG charter. Optional incubation was added based only on 3+1 votes to the Charter w/o discussion in the WG itself. Hardly a consensus, and hardly AC agreement. I don't disagree with the outcome but the way it happened is absolutely not normal, nor in the spirit of our Process. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 17:43:09 UTC