- From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:24:59 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Yes, agreed, we miss defining what happens to anything other than a technical document, here. I assume (until we cut over to GitHub) you should raise an Issue. > On Dec 16, 2016, at 0:39 , Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > Hello. > > I think we miss something in section 7.1 > > 7.1.2 item 2 links to "substantive changes" in section 6.2.5 but the > list there refers to technical documents only. > > "Substantive changes" is then undefined for Charter review or even for > Process review. > > In the missing definition, and following a recent event that deeply > shocked me, I think we need to categorize "changes that impact the > internal process of the Group" as changes beyond "substantive" and > falling into 7.1.2 item 3, "returned for additional work”. do you have a pointer? it’s nice to have a “test case” or example > > Thanks. > > </Daniel> > Dave Singer singer@mac.com
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 17:25:38 UTC