Re: [Issue-101] Replacement for the other of the diagrams in the Process document

On 10/6/2015 11:50 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>
> See below
>
> *From:*Jeff Jaffe [mailto:jeff@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2015 6:20 PM
> *To:* Stephen Zilles; public-w3process@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Issue-101] Replacement for the other of the diagrams 
> in the Process document
>
> Steve,
>
> In CR, if there are substantial changes we stay in CR; but if there 
> are very substantial changes we go back to WD.
>
> Have we defined the difference between substantial changes and very 
> substantial changes?
>
> */[SZ] No, IMO it is up to the WG to decide whether the changes would 
> take a document out of CR. The most obvious reason would be that there 
> need to be major implementation changes and, therefore, the document 
> is not really ready for implementation (the anachronistic definition 
> of CR) anymore. If the changes involve implementation tweeks and the 
> participants agree that they should be made, then those are 
> substantive, but not “very substantive”. If you think putting in some 
> text like that would be useful, it could be proposed/*
>

I wasn't making a proposal.  I was just trying to make sense of the 
terms in the proposed diagram.  Your explanation doesn't make it clear 
enough (at least for me).

> *//*
>
> */Steve Z/*
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
> On 10/5/2015 10:17 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>
>     A proposed, revised replacement for diagram in sections 6.7 of the 2015 Process Document
>
>        http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#revised-rec
>
>     is attached.
>
>       
>
>     Comments are welcome
>
>       
>
>     Steve Z
>