W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2014

Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated

From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:54:21 +0200
To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3101413993261@webcorp01e.yandex-team.ru>

21.10.2014, 19:45, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>:
> A few comments:
> On 10/21/2014 11:43 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
>>  - sysbot+tracker@
>>  I propose the following text:
>>  [[[
>>  The Team consists of the Director, the CEO, and other staff and interns employed as W3C staff, plus W3C Fellows, who are employees of W3C Members provided to work for the Team on secondment. Functions and responsibilities of the Team, Director or CEO may be delegated from time to time.
> This is good as far as it goes (although I agree with Mike's comment
> about the delegation sentence).

Me too.

> Other comments:
> 1. The current text has a useful paragraph describing the
> process-related responsibilities of the Director.  I'm not sure why they
> were omitted.

As I said in the meeting, anything the director does should be described in the Process document at the relevant place. I assume you mean

The Director is the lead technical architect at W3C and as such, is responsible for assessing consensus within W3C for architectural choices, publication of technical reports, and new activities. The Director appoints group Chairs and has the role of "tie-breaker" for questions of Good Standing in a Working Group or appeal of a Working Group decision. The Director is generally Chair of the TAG.

The responsibilities with regards to technical specifications are detailed in chapter 7. 

Activities are removed, but the director's role in chartering groups is in chapter 6. Admittedly it doesn't explicitly say anywhere how a decision to start a group is made, there is a review and then the director MAY issue a call for participation - and the charter MAY be changed from the one that was reviewed. But that's a 10-year-old text.

Appointing chairs is part of chartering (and one of the things it seems can be changed…).

There is no good standing for the director to "tie-break". Appeals of a working group decision are an open issue, but the relevant section (3.5) already outlines the director's role.

The director is generally NOT the chair of the TAG, and apparently doesn't want to be.

> 2. In today's discussion about the reference to Hosts, Steve said we
> might not need it here because it is "somewhere".  Except that I think
> that somewhere is actually here!  I think there is a consensus that it
> should be somewhere.

I don't believe there is a consensus. You were in favour of mentioning them (I don't really understand why) and I am not (since they play no role in the Process itself, and were *only* mentioned in this section).

>  Is it elsewhere?

No. There was no mention of them anywhere else in the document. It does say that they are *not* W3C members...

>  Are you proposing to move it elsewhere?

No. I am unclear what purpose it serves for the Process.


>>  ]]]
>>  21.10.2014, 16:50, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>:
>>>  w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated
>>>  http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/36
>>>  Assigned to: Charles McCathie Nevile
>>  --
>>  Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
>>  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2014 15:54:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:22 UTC