- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:52:00 +0100
- To: "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org>, "Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:45:19 +0100, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote: > Charles, > The goal for the 2nd Last Call draft was to have a complete Process > document in which Chapter 7 is replaced and the change information in a > new Section 15 or an Appendix labelled "Changes" per the resolution of > Issue 63 [1]. Similarly, the updates requested in Issues 61[2], 62[3] > and 64[4] should be implemented in the full draft. All of this is true. It is also 1.45am and I am sorry, but I am going to sleep and finish this tomorrow. cheers Chaals > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/63 > [2] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/61 > [3] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/62 > [4] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/64 > > Steve Z > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:19 AM > To: Ralph Swick > Cc: public-w3process@w3.org > Subject: Re: Draft for Last Call > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:44:04 +0100, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote: > >> On 3/9/2014 8:03 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> following the AB meeting, and incorporation of the last editorial >>> comments, I have produced a draft for the AB to check and hopefully >>> approve as a Last Call (to be proposed incorporated into a full >>> version of the Process Document). >>> >>> The document is at >>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/13a947c0bdc9/tr.html and changes >>> are detailed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/ >> >> I don't see the inclusion of text per the discussion scribed below. >> Am I overlooking it somewhere? > > No, it seems that I just dreamed putting it in :( > > Later today I will release a new draft, with this and the suggestions > that came from Wayne. > > cheers > >> [[ >> Ralph: Something just came up in an internal conversation ... the >> question is when we're rescinding a W3C Rec >> >> <Ralph> Rescinding a Recommendation >> >> Ralph: Text in the current process says that there is a publication of >> a rescinded Re[c] announced that encourages the Team to update the >> status of the thing that was rescinded ... to note this is no longer a >> Rec ... in my reading, there is no language in the current proposal to >> suggest the Team should update a W3C Rec is rescinded >> >> chaals: I agree, and there should be; obvious oversight. >> >> Ralph: The current process doesn't suggest how it should be done, just >> that it should be done ... The current proposal doesn't even have a >> suggestion >> >> SteveZ: Accepted >> >> chaals: WFM >> >> Ralph: I'll provide specific language, if you wish. >> ... Do you need to see specific language? [no] ]] >> >> >>> >>> cheers >>> >>> Chaals >>> >> > > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 00:52:34 UTC