Re: Draft for Last Call

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:45:19 +0100, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>  
wrote:

> Charles,
> The goal for the 2nd Last Call draft was to have a complete Process  
> document in which Chapter 7 is replaced and the change information in a  
> new Section 15 or an Appendix labelled "Changes" per the resolution of  
> Issue 63 [1]. Similarly, the updates requested in Issues 61[2], 62[3]  
> and 64[4] should be implemented in the full draft.

All of this is true. It is also 1.45am and I am sorry, but I am going to  
sleep and finish this tomorrow.

cheers

Chaals

> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/63
> [2] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/61
> [3] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/62
> [4] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/64
>
> Steve Z
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:19 AM
> To: Ralph Swick
> Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Draft for Last Call
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:44:04 +0100, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> On 3/9/2014 8:03 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> following the AB meeting, and incorporation of the last editorial
>>> comments, I have produced a draft for the AB to check and hopefully
>>> approve as a Last Call (to be proposed incorporated into a full
>>> version of the Process Document).
>>>
>>> The document is at
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/13a947c0bdc9/tr.html and changes
>>> are detailed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/
>>
>> I don't see the inclusion of text per the discussion scribed below.
>> Am I overlooking it somewhere?
>
> No, it seems that I just dreamed putting it in :(
>
> Later today I will release a new draft, with this and the suggestions  
> that came from Wayne.
>
> cheers
>
>> [[
>> Ralph: Something just came up in an internal conversation ... the
>> question is when we're rescinding a W3C Rec
>>
>> <Ralph> Rescinding a Recommendation
>>
>> Ralph: Text in the current process says that there is a publication of
>> a rescinded Re[c] announced that encourages the Team to update the
>> status of the thing that was rescinded ... to note this is no longer a
>> Rec ... in my reading, there is no language in the current proposal to
>> suggest the Team should update a W3C Rec is rescinded
>>
>> chaals: I agree, and there should be; obvious oversight.
>>
>> Ralph: The current process doesn't suggest how it should be done, just
>> that it should be done ... The current proposal doesn't even have a
>> suggestion
>>
>> SteveZ: Accepted
>>
>> chaals: WFM
>>
>> Ralph: I'll provide specific language, if you wish.
>> ... Do you need to see specific language? [no] ]]
>>
>>
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Chaals
>>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 00:52:34 UTC