Re: Suggested and Adopted updates to the Dec 11 Process Document Draft, part 2

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:51:59 +0100, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
wrote:

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 4:26 PM
> To: Stephen Zilles
> Cc: 'public-w3process@w3.org'; Michael Champion  
> (Michael.Champion@microsoft.com)
> Subject: Re: Suggested and Adopted updates to the Dec 11 Process  
> Document Draft, part 2
>
> I've implemented changes in the draft I will publish tonight, but not  
> for everything. Note my comments inline
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:26:30 +0100, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>> 6.     Section 7.4, 3rd bullet, says, “must document how adequate
>> implementation experience will be demonstrated." Section 7.5.2 >has
>> two bullets, 2 and 6 which (a) seem to be saying the same thing
>
> They don't. The first is meeting the requirement for advancement, the  
> second is documenting the follow-up of a previous expectation that was  
> set.
>
> SZ: None of the readers during the 13 January meeting found that  
> interpretation. You can ask that the topic be reopened, but see the  
> comments below.

Hmm. On reconsideration I that dropping the redundant bullet makes sense.
It will be implemented in the next Editor's draft.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
         chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 08:54:12 UTC