- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:03:05 +0400
- To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 03:11:15 +0400, Charles McCathie Nevile
<chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pushed a new draft:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/20fb4f012006/tr.html
And I just pushed an update to that:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/acebbefd27bb/tr.html
There are no significant changes but I fixed the date (now 5 Feb) and
there are a few editorial tweaks, to reduce confusion between the two
quite different drafts dated 2 February.
> Please review because it incorporates significant changes since previous
> drafts.
>
> The most important changes are an explanation of what is required to
> publish a revised Candidate Rec, and the reinstatement of a Proposed Rec
> phase to clarify the process from Candidate Recommendation to
> Recommendation.
>
> These changes are intended to close issues 76, 77 and 84.
>
> The changelogs at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/ provide details, but the
> big changes are introduction of a new section 7.5 and changes to 7.4 and
> 7.6 to match. It is possible that I missed something, or was
> over-enthusiastic in bringing everything into line, so problems may be
> as simple as grammar issues or as complex as unclear or inappropriate
> interactions of requirements.
>
> With this draft I hope to have closed all the outstanding issues we
> except those relating to incorporating the chapter into a complete
> document and the deferred issue-6…
>
> cheers
>
> chaals
>
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:03:35 UTC