- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:03:05 +0400
- To: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 03:11:15 +0400, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > Hi, > > I just pushed a new draft: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/20fb4f012006/tr.html And I just pushed an update to that: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/acebbefd27bb/tr.html There are no significant changes but I fixed the date (now 5 Feb) and there are a few editorial tweaks, to reduce confusion between the two quite different drafts dated 2 February. > Please review because it incorporates significant changes since previous > drafts. > > The most important changes are an explanation of what is required to > publish a revised Candidate Rec, and the reinstatement of a Proposed Rec > phase to clarify the process from Candidate Recommendation to > Recommendation. > > These changes are intended to close issues 76, 77 and 84. > > The changelogs at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/ provide details, but the > big changes are introduction of a new section 7.5 and changes to 7.4 and > 7.6 to match. It is possible that I missed something, or was > over-enthusiastic in bringing everything into line, so problems may be > as simple as grammar issues or as complex as unclear or inappropriate > interactions of requirements. > > With this draft I hope to have closed all the outstanding issues we > except those relating to incorporating the chapter into a complete > document and the deferred issue-6… > > cheers > > chaals > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:03:35 UTC