W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: Invited expert agreement

From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:29:26 +0300
To: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <michael.champion@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <78111418930966@webcorp01g.yandex-team.ru>
18.12.2014, 22:12, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>:
> Thanks Sam. šI've created https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/150 to bring this to the Chair's attention as an issue we want to build consensus on and make a recommendation to W3C management.

The chair of the CG already has it on the radar, but thanks for making the issue. Reminds me I have some chairing to do on the non-Process doc stuff.

I'm assuming that consensus, or a lack of it, will emerge fairly fast here. I think it is important to simultaneously talk directly to the AC, and the chairs, since they probably have input. Now that there is an issue to refer to I can do the easy job of forwarding the pointers :)

cheers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:49 AM
> To: public-w3process@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Invited expert agreement
>
> On 12/18/2014 10:37 AM, Olle Olsson wrote:
>> šOn 2014-12-18 12:10, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>> šI suggest you draft a proposal for a modified IE agreement yourself
>>>> šand invite comments.
>>>>
>>>> šAlthough I claim there is no grey in my beard - and that funny
>>>> šlighting makes it seem there may be - I have found that is a more
>>>> šeffective way to move things forward than waiting for someone else
>>>> što do the drafting.
>>> šFair enough:
>>>
>>> šhttp://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/12/18/08-invited-expert.html
>>>
>>> šThe one change is the removal of a single paragraph in section 2.2.
>> ššFrom what I see, there are šTWO paragraphs deleted.
>> šShould the last paragraph of section 2 in
>> ššššhttp://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2014/08-invited-expert.html
>> šbe kept and not deleted?
>
> Good catch! šRestored!
>
> I see how it happened. šIf you look closely at the original source you will see two paragraphs flowed together.
>> š/olle
>
> - Sam Ruby

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2014 19:29:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC