W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: Invited expert agreement

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:49:11 -0500
Message-ID: <5492F777.9060903@intertwingly.net>
To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 12/18/2014 10:37 AM, Olle Olsson wrote:
> On 2014-12-18 12:10, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest you draft a proposal for a modified IE agreement yourself
>>> and invite comments.
>>>
>>> Although I claim there is no grey in my beard - and that funny
>>> lighting makes it seem there may be - I have found that is a more
>>> effective way to move things forward than waiting for someone else to
>>> do the drafting.
>>
>> Fair enough:
>>
>> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/12/18/08-invited-expert.html
>>
>> The one change is the removal of a single paragraph in section 2.2.
>
>  From what I see, there are  TWO paragraphs deleted.
> Should the last paragraph of section 2 in
>    http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2014/08-invited-expert.html
> be kept and not deleted?

Good catch!  Restored!

I see how it happened.  If you look closely at the original source you 
will see two paragraphs flowed together.

> /olle

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2014 15:49:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC