W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: Invited expert agreement

From: Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:37:40 +0100
Message-ID: <5492F4C4.1050406@sics.se>
To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 2014-12-18 12:10, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> I suggest you draft a proposal for a modified IE agreement yourself 
>> and invite comments.
>>
>> Although I claim there is no grey in my beard - and that funny 
>> lighting makes it seem there may be - I have found that is a more 
>> effective way to move things forward than waiting for someone else to 
>> do the drafting.
>
> Fair enough:
>
> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/12/18/08-invited-expert.html
>
> The one change is the removal of a single paragraph in section 2.2.

 From what I see, there are  TWO paragraphs deleted.
Should the last paragraph of section 2 in
   http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2014/08-invited-expert.html
be kept and not deleted?


/olle

> - Sam Ruby
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Olle Olsson   olleo@sics.se   Tel: +46 8 633 15 19  Fax: +46 8 751 72 30
         [Svenska W3C-kontoret: olleo@w3.org]
SICS [Swedish Institute of Computer Science]
Box 1263
SE - 164 29 Kista
Sweden
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2014 15:38:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC