W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: What is Process Good For?

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:10:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqWZL+7W8m=7CK103OevGG_87KGqnxjvnFQPnCouaR24ZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Noting that there doesn't seem to be others agreeing with my points,
> perhaps this thread should be wound down.  At a minimum, I'll respond less
> frequently.

Actually, no, Sam, I just think you're doing a fine job of expressing my
views too.  In particular:

>Meanwhile, I will caution you: if you continue to attempt to keep a tight
grip on the standards you have through onerous Invited Expert terms and
conditions and Document Licenses, what I suspect is that you will
increasingly find that standards will be defined -- WITH CONSENSUS! --
elsewhere.  And the W3C will be reduced to belatedly giving their stamp of

Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 16:11:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC