W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2014

Re: What is Process Good For?

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:09:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqXEzTTkvX-YFeiiZRmJUGbssX94sWu6Fv_VYoiruEbGxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
> In terms of the CC0 license, my impression is that the AC is not there
> yet, although clearly some in the W3C community support that notion.  And
> personally I'm not convinced that it is a good idea since CC0 advocates
> have been explicit that they like the idea that they could create
> derivative specs elsewhere (which would lead to fragmentation).

If the only thing keeping development of a standard in the W3C is the
copyright license on the specification, then the W3C is doomed.
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 16:10:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:25 UTC