- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:52:30 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 11/12/14 17:33, David Singer wrote: > That’s not the problem we’re talking about currently. We’re talking about what happens when people *change* employment. We haven’t yet had any proposal to change the rules on who can stand as candidates. Yes, and I don't see why an individual ACs voted for should become instantaneously suspect because there is already someone else from the same employer in the same committee. Again, ACs elected an individual, and I find a rule forcing that individual to leave a committee because he found a new job just counter-productive and trampling ACs' votes underfoot. As if we had soooo many people at that expertise and dedication level and as if 2 people under same umbrella could be a deadly threat. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 16:52:54 UTC