- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:50:18 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 11/12/14 15:26, Sam Ruby wrote: > Taking David's original example: is there anyone here would be opposed > to instituting a rule that no more that 5 of the TAG participants be a > white male? After all, wouldn't it be prudent to institute such a rule? It could be worse, they could all 5 be of french descent... > But that's not the direction I would suggest that the W3C take further. > I still think that a better approach do diversity is to change the > election system in ways that are currently being evaluated. That plus > the feedback look that Daniel is describing should be what is pursued. Thanks. This is a vote after all; let's trust the AC to _not_ vote for too many individuals coming from the same employer. Dan said in his last message we have a rather good consensus. On a weak and good enough compromise, yes. On the best solution, I'm not sure. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 14:50:42 UTC