- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:35:22 +1100
- To: "Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:41:56 +1100, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/27/2013 5:11 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>> Comments below
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:36 PM
>> To: public-w3process@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than
>> implement it across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a
>> "candidate" period [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
>>
>> On 11/27/13 3:13 PM, ext Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:33:51 +1100, Revising W3C Process Community
>>> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than implement it
>>>> across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate"
>>>> period [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
>>> This is a duplicate of ISSUE-39 which is already open.
>> I disagree. Please keep Issue-68 separate.
>>
>> -Thanks, AB
>>
>> SZ: Art, could you please be more specific about what your issue is. We
>> have not yet chosen the method for phasing in a new Chapter 7 assuming
>> such gets approved by an AC Review. You list this as a Chapter 7 issue,
>> but it does not affect any part of Chapter 7, only the method by which
>> it would be phased in and that is not part of the Process. It is,
>> however, part of the discussion. Given that, I am not sure what you
>> mean by a Candidate Period?
>
> I believe Art is requesting that for a period of time, WGs have an
> option to use the current Chapter 7 or the new one. Since that would
> mean that we have two extant Chapter 7's at once, arguably that is a
> Chapter 7 issue.
Sure. But that is already precisely covered by ISSUE-39. Art, can you
explain what in this issue *isn't* covered by ISSUE-39?
cheers
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 23:36:02 UTC