- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:36:12 -0500
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 11/27/13 3:13 PM, ext Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:33:51 +1100, Revising W3C Process Community > Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> w3process-ISSUE-68 (Ch7-DogFood-The-New-CR): Rather than implement it >> across-the-board, perhaps it would be useful to have a "candidate" >> period [Document life cycle (ch 7)] > > This is a duplicate of ISSUE-39 which is already open. I disagree. Please keep Issue-68 separate. -Thanks, AB
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 20:39:23 UTC