- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:02:46 +0000
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Cc: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Advisory Board <ab@w3.org>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > On Thursday, November 7, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > > What we did consider are a couple of points: > > - The LC and CR signals in the current process tend to happen these days after specs are widely implemented and what might sound like constructive suggestions (e.g., "the names aren't very intuitive") are made too late to be helpful. > > > > It is absolutely critical to get developer eyeballs looking at the specs before it's too late to change the APIs. Anything that helps with this is an important step forward. > Agree. It’s also never too early to get input into a spec from anyone. Taking away signals that allow people to wait longer to provide feedback would actually be a good thing. LC or CR is _waaaaayyy_ too late to be providing feedback. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 14:03:15 UTC