Re: Scope Re: w3process-ISSUE-36:

On 7/8/13 1:07 PM, ext Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:32:53 +0400, Arthur Barstow 
> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/8/13 10:26 AM, ext Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue 
>> Tracker wrote:
>>> w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent 
>>> Policy be changed? [Process Document]
>>
>> No.
>>
>> It seems to me that this effort - to update the TR process - should 
>> be predicated on some basic axioms/assumptions and IMHO, one of them 
>> is that updates to the PP should not be blocked on changes to the PP.
>
> Updates to the Process should not depend on Patent POlicy changes? I 
> agree.

Oops, yes, indeed I meant "updates to the PD/ProcDoc should not depend 
on changes to the PP/PatentPolicy". Sorry the confusion.

Received on Monday, 8 July 2013 17:11:21 UTC