Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD from Arthur Barstow on 2013-12-13 (public-w3process@w3.org from December 2013)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:47:56 -0500
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <52AB2C2C.5070607@nokia.com>

On 12/13/13 10:17 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 12/13/13 10:11 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
>> I guess that's why I am not yet convinced it should be a MUST.
>
> FWIW, I agree with Ian (and I would likely object to this being a 
> `must` requirement).

Please disregard what I said above.

(Chaals and I just discussed my comment in IRC and my comment above is 
about Issue-79).

Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 15:54:04 UTC