Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references

On 12/6/13 8:34 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Arthur Barstow <> wrote:
>> Come to think about it, I have a strong preference to use 
>> <> for all 
>> process-related bug and issue tracking including publication rules. 
>> Please do NOT bury this Issue in particular in Member-confidential 
>> space. 
> A new space would be public. But this is still not the right forum.


Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:39:32 UTC