- From: Deborah Dahl <Dahl@conversational-Technologies.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:44:35 -0500
- To: <public-voiceinteraction@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <021001d715e5$ccfd37c0$66f7a740$@conversational-Technologies.com>
https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-voiceinteraction-minutes.html and below as text [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Voice Interaction Community Group 10 March 2021 [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log. [2] <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0001.h tml> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0001.ht ml [3] <https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-voiceinteraction-irc> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-voiceinteraction-irc Attendees Present debbie, jim Regrets Bev, Jon (partial) Chair Debbie Scribe ddahl Contents 1. [4]Jim's suggestions Meeting minutes Jim's suggestions Jim's comments: [5]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0002.html [5] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0002.ht ml jim: the document should discuss interfaces debbie: there's another document called "interfaces", very rudimentary jim: who is the audience? debbie: one audience is developers for application developers . also platform developers jim: there should be a sentence describing audience debbie: we should add that jim: what is the problem? debbie: I think it's interoperability jim: I think that's the main purpose . describe principles about how the partition was arrived at . general software principles could be referenced . there is a nice hierarchical partitioning debbie: we were using a traditional partitioning for conversational systems jim: this should be included in the document debbie: agree jim: 2.1 this is a specialized IPA debbie: it was supposed to be general, maybe we should remove this because it's not consistent with the later walkthrough jim: what is the difference between general and specialized IPA debbie: the general IPA does general things, but it's a portal to more specialized IPA's jim: the general IPA is something like current smart speakers . our audience will be building specialized IPA's, not the general IPA's . maybe the document should focus on specialized IPA's debbie: I think we have to talk about both because they have to interoperate jim: the target should be specialized IPA's debbie: what's the role of standards with specialized IPA's jim: they could share components like ASR or TTS . maybe only the front end is generalized . a generalized IPA can answer anything in the world . it could be a portal to a specialized IPA debbie: the generalized IPA knows about public information jim: generalized IPA could be a portal to a specialized IPA . much like a web browser . a specialized IPA knows information about a particular business debbie: more general, e.g. government, nonprofit, school . we should not drop this because we need them to interoperate . we should have more explanation about the difference . between general and specialized IPA's jim: this document provides information for specialized IPA's . there will be few generalized IPA's jim: begin architecture section with 3 high level boxes and then expand debbie: I like the idea of making it more multimodal jim: more IPA's will have screens . move ASR and TTS out of dialog box into client box +1 jim: what is a "session"? debbie: we should define what we mean by "session" jim: may extend over days, multiple users could come and go . standards committees have ongoing sessions with multiple meetings debbie: credentials next time restart at "client activation strategy" Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [6]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC). [6] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2021 19:44:52 UTC