- From: Deborah Dahl <Dahl@conversational-Technologies.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:44:35 -0500
- To: <public-voiceinteraction@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <021001d715e5$ccfd37c0$66f7a740$@conversational-Technologies.com>
https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-voiceinteraction-minutes.html
and below as text
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Voice Interaction Community Group
10 March 2021
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2]
<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0001.h
tml>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0001.ht
ml
[3] <https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-voiceinteraction-irc>
https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-voiceinteraction-irc
Attendees
Present
debbie, jim
Regrets
Bev, Jon (partial)
Chair
Debbie
Scribe
ddahl
Contents
1. [4]Jim's suggestions
Meeting minutes
Jim's suggestions
Jim's comments: [5]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0002.html
[5]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0002.ht
ml
jim: the document should discuss interfaces
debbie: there's another document called "interfaces", very
rudimentary
jim: who is the audience?
debbie: one audience is developers for application developers
. also platform developers
jim: there should be a sentence describing audience
debbie: we should add that
jim: what is the problem?
debbie: I think it's interoperability
jim: I think that's the main purpose
. describe principles about how the partition was arrived at
. general software principles could be referenced
. there is a nice hierarchical partitioning
debbie: we were using a traditional partitioning for
conversational systems
jim: this should be included in the document
debbie: agree
jim: 2.1 this is a specialized IPA
debbie: it was supposed to be general, maybe we should remove
this because it's not consistent with the later walkthrough
jim: what is the difference between general and specialized IPA
debbie: the general IPA does general things, but it's a portal
to more specialized IPA's
jim: the general IPA is something like current smart speakers
. our audience will be building specialized IPA's, not the
general IPA's
. maybe the document should focus on specialized IPA's
debbie: I think we have to talk about both because they have to
interoperate
jim: the target should be specialized IPA's
debbie: what's the role of standards with specialized IPA's
jim: they could share components like ASR or TTS
. maybe only the front end is generalized
. a generalized IPA can answer anything in the world
. it could be a portal to a specialized IPA
debbie: the generalized IPA knows about public information
jim: generalized IPA could be a portal to a specialized IPA
. much like a web browser
. a specialized IPA knows information about a particular
business
debbie: more general, e.g. government, nonprofit, school
. we should not drop this because we need them to interoperate
. we should have more explanation about the difference
. between general and specialized IPA's
jim: this document provides information for specialized IPA's
. there will be few generalized IPA's
jim: begin architecture section with 3 high level boxes and
then expand
debbie: I like the idea of making it more multimodal
jim: more IPA's will have screens
. move ASR and TTS out of dialog box into client box
+1
jim: what is a "session"?
debbie: we should define what we mean by "session"
jim: may extend over days, multiple users could come and go
. standards committees have ongoing sessions with multiple
meetings
debbie: credentials
next time restart at "client activation strategy"
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[6]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC).
[6] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2021 19:44:52 UTC