- From: Dirk Schnelle-Walka <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:50:02 +0100 (CET)
- To: public-voiceinteraction@w3.org
Hey there, I added the things mentioned below to a the document draft. As usual, a pre-rendered version can be seen at https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/voice%20interaction%20drafts/paArchitecture.htm At all, please review and comment on that. We really need your input to improve it. @Debbie Please, check my language in that document. Dirk > Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com> hat am 27. Februar 2020 16:44 geschrieben: > > > https://www.w3.org/2020/02/27-voiceinteraction-minutes.html > > and below as text > > [1]W3C > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > > > - DRAFT - > > > > Voice Interaction Community Group > > > > 27 Feb 2020 > > > > Attendees > > > > Present > > dirk, debbie > > > > Regrets > > > > Chair > > dirk > > > > Scribe > > Debbie > > > > Contents > > > > * [2]Topics > > * [3]Summary of Action Items > > * [4]Summary of Resolutions > > __________________________________________________________ > > > > <scribe> Scribe: Debbie > > > > debbie: looking at > > [5]https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/voice%20interaction%2 > > 0drafts/paArchitecture.htm > > ... what about multimodal applications? > > > > [5] https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/voice interaction > drafts/paArchitecture.htm > > > > dirk: this could be covered by local commands > > ... text chatbots should fit into this architecture > > ... eventually multimodal should be supported, but now we will > > cover voice > > > > debbie: VoiceXML as a potential standard for dialog management > > > > dirk: we should add that > > > > debbie: change "potentially related standards" to "potentially > > related standards and proposals", so we can include JROSI > > > > dirk: will add > > > > debbie: could "IPA Client" be a browser? > > > > dirk: could include HTML > > > > debbie: other group [6]https://www.w3.org/community/conv/ > > ... conversational interfaces > > ... should we update walk-through of use case? > > > > [6] https://www.w3.org/community/conv/ > > > > dirk: probably not necessary for now > > > > debbie: we should publish this, should we make changes first? > > > > dirk: can make changes > > > > debbie: will double check language > > ... should publish before SpeechTEK > > ... should also invite Open Voice Network to review > > ... when we publish we should put something on social media > > ... try to get SpeechTEK and AVIOS to tweet about it > > > > dirk: will write something on LinkedIn > > > > debbie: send to the group for approval by the middle of next > > week > > ... we can give them 48 hours > > > > dirk: what roles are involved, like user, developer, IPA > > supplier? > > > > debbie: we can put in a section that says they will be > > discussed in a future draft > > ... should also be thinking about the SpeechTEK presentation > > > > dirk: they want it by April 1 > > ... next step will be to refine this document > > ... next call is March 12, in two weeks > > > > Summary of Action Items > > > > Summary of Resolutions > > > > [End of minutes] > > __________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 28 February 2020 08:50:19 UTC