[voiceinteraction] minutes February 27, 2020

https://www.w3.org/2020/02/27-voiceinteraction-minutes.html

and below as text

   [1]W3C

 

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

 

                               - DRAFT -

 

                   Voice Interaction Community Group

 

27 Feb 2020

 

Attendees

 

   Present

          dirk, debbie

 

   Regrets

 

   Chair

          dirk

 

   Scribe

          Debbie

 

Contents

 

     * [2]Topics

     * [3]Summary of Action Items

     * [4]Summary of Resolutions

     __________________________________________________________

 

   <scribe> Scribe: Debbie

 

   debbie: looking at

   [5]https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/voice%20interaction%2

   0drafts/paArchitecture.htm

   ... what about multimodal applications?

 

      [5] https://w3c.github.io/voiceinteraction/voice interaction
drafts/paArchitecture.htm

 

   dirk: this could be covered by local commands

   ... text chatbots should fit into this architecture

   ... eventually multimodal should be supported, but now we will

   cover voice

 

   debbie: VoiceXML as a potential standard for dialog management

 

   dirk: we should add that

 

   debbie: change "potentially related standards" to "potentially

   related standards and proposals", so we can include JROSI

 

   dirk: will add

 

   debbie: could "IPA Client" be a browser?

 

   dirk: could include HTML

 

   debbie: other group [6]https://www.w3.org/community/conv/

   ... conversational interfaces

   ... should we update walk-through of use case?

 

      [6] https://www.w3.org/community/conv/

 

   dirk: probably not necessary for now

 

   debbie: we should publish this, should we make changes first?

 

   dirk: can make changes

 

   debbie: will double check language

   ... should publish before SpeechTEK

   ... should also invite Open Voice Network to review

   ... when we publish we should put something on social media

   ... try to get SpeechTEK and AVIOS to tweet about it

 

   dirk: will write something on LinkedIn

 

   debbie: send to the group for approval by the middle of next

   week

   ... we can give them 48 hours

 

   dirk: what roles are involved, like user, developer, IPA

   supplier?

 

   debbie: we can put in a section that says they will be

   discussed in a future draft

   ... should also be thinking about the SpeechTEK presentation

 

   dirk: they want it by April 1

   ... next step will be to refine this document

   ... next call is March 12, in two weeks

 

Summary of Action Items

 

Summary of Resolutions

 

   [End of minutes]

     __________________________________________________________