Re: Collection / Container / List (+Pagination)

Elf,

If your talking only about foaf:member, then you are correct, since the
spec clearly states the Domain and Range.

I was mentioning that there are some web vocabularies out there (if I
recall it was a Scientific vocab I had stumbled upon, but damned if I can
remember which one at this moment) that have no such implication, and that
it is wrong to always think that a Domain always implies a Group.

But in your case, and usage with foaf:member, you are correct.


Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:47 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

> On 03/06/2015 06:29 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:23 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
> > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Thad,
> >>
> >> On 03/06/2015 06:17 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Domain: having this property implies being a Group
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ​This is false.  Its not implied in all Schema models out there.
> >>
> >> Do you refer to foaf:member
> >> http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_member
> >>
> >> Or schema:member
> >> http://schema.org/member
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> If you talk about foaf:member, can link to some examples which don't
> >> respect its rdfs:domain?
> >>
> >
> > Elf,
> >
> > There's a few in here when I checked last year, don't remember which
> ones:
> > http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=Domain&page=1
> >
> now you really lost me...
>
> i replied to Melvin saying that foaf:Group uses property/predicate
> foaf:member which has rdfs:range set to foaf:Agent (and rdfs:domain to
> foaf:Group)
>
> i provided few links from FOAF spec and copying over few lines from there.
>
> i think you understood something else, maybe me talking about Domain
> term from human (english) language, used for term definitions in various
> web vocabularies?
>
>