- From: Steve Scott <steve@courseload.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:46:59 -0500
- To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Cc: Jim Goodell <jgoodell2@yahoo.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAEZqr8tehfScM_ayCouNVXQ5pYRLb8=dq-+CinevD5=5qD0wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Just a few opinions from the peanut gallery... I would avoid Class as a label for Course since it is most widely used to relate to the cohort attending a Course (my class == my classmates) and/or the time of meeting (my Bio Class is Tue at 9 - class == single class session). Instructional temporality is generally related to a "Term" to which a Course section belongs and inherits it's timeframe. "Course of Study" and "Major" are common synonyms in my experience working with higher ed. -Steve On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote: > I agree that another term besides "Course" needs to be considered. (Oddly > enough, I attended a university that uses "course" the way other US > universities use "major", so I am sympathetic to the issues with the term..) > > Putting aside Course vs Class vs some other term for now, what is the > objection to a subclass for online sessions? > > - Vicki > > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Jim Goodell <jgoodell2@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> I used what seems to be the key points of consensus from comments posted >> to Vicki’s doc, and the thread, to mark up suggested changes to the >> proposal. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12YWjLzZC8FiTiOwSAETRIEozeqZdn6O8a4fgqK4t5Ss/edit?usp=sharing >> >> -Jim Goodell >> >> > -- *Steve Scott* COURSELOAD Chief Technology Officer 351 W. 10th St., Suite 250 Indianapolis, IN 46202 *M *765.744.3382 *E **steve@courseload.com* <steve@courseload.com> *http://www.courseload.com/ <http://www.courseload.com/>*
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2015 22:00:33 UTC