- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:51:23 -0600
- To: Jim Goodell <jimgoodell@qi-partners.com>
- Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, Jim Goodell <jgoodell2@yahoo.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfEFw94vhmSa+_rSg7UPPRg5vEMLcKgo+U0yfUHTxYzrqTfBg@mail.gmail.com>
Class-central [1] differentiates between 'Self Paced' and 'courses with a start and end date'. [1] https://www.class-central.com/subject/cs On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Jim Goodell <jimgoodell@qi-partners.com> wrote: > I don’t think we had a strong objection to use of a subclass for the > concept of online course (and online course section), only a strong feeling > that there is a better option, i.e. just add a property to > Course/CourseSection objects to indicate that it is designed-for/offered > “online”. It keeps things simple and flexible. > > Others can chime in here. My perspective is based on this: CEDS > stakeholders looked into this and found that most of the properties are the > same as traditional courses. Properties that we might think of as unique to > an online course, such as “Course Interaction Mode” (1), could also apply > to blended learning courses that involve both online and off line > participation. So that group opted to go with a “Virtual Indicator” (2) > flag rather than define a new entity. > > -jim > > > (1) https://ceds.ed.gov/CEDSElementDetails.aspx?TermId=8277 > (2) https://ceds.ed.gov/CEDSElementDetails.aspx?TermId=8167 > > From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> > Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM > To: Jim Goodell <jgoodell2@yahoo.com> > Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] schema:OnlineCourse > Resent-From: <public-vocabs@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:29:07 +0000 > > I agree that another term besides "Course" needs to be considered. (Oddly > enough, I attended a university that uses "course" the way other US > universities use "major", so I am sympathetic to the issues with the term.) > > Putting aside Course vs Class vs some other term for now, what is the > objection to a subclass for online sessions? > > - Vicki > > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Jim Goodell <jgoodell2@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> I used what seems to be the key points of consensus from comments posted >> to Vicki’s doc, and the thread, to mark up suggested changes to the >> proposal. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12YWjLzZC8FiTiOwSAETRIEozeqZdn6O8a4fgqK4t5Ss/edit?usp=sharing >> >> -Jim Goodell >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2015 17:51:51 UTC