- From: Peter Krauss <ppkrauss@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:02:59 -0300
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Anastasia Baryshnikova <asia.baryshnikova@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHEREttw_O_LY9LaDZXZMw1=UE=5+QCs5J7aOW9N_tJDasd+zQ@mail.gmail.com>
It is a semantic/technological subtlety... I think this kind of demand is better to fix by URNs, examples (suppose a "mydic" for "my dictionary URN schema"), urn:mydic:en:mum urn:mydic:pt-br:mamãe urn:myterm:en:environment urn:myterm:pt-br:meio.ambiente the key to work with URNs and SchemaOrg is the URN-Resolver, see discussion at https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/405#issuecomment-88501504 Peter 2015-04-13 5:21 GMT-03:00 Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>: > Anastasia > > Indeed schema.org currently lacks terms to describe linguistic / > knowledge organization resources such as dictionaries. Maybe a future > extension ... > > Meanwhile, you might wish to explore > http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs?tag=Vocabularies > which provides some vocabularies designed to describe language and > linguistic resources > > The first on the list, GOLD (http://purl.org/linguistics/gold) certainly > provides expressivity beyond your needs. > Lexvo.org ontology (http://lexvo.org/ontology) is simpler and used in > lexvo.org terminological data base. > > Hope that helps. > > > 2015-04-13 10:01 GMT+02:00 Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>: > >> >> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:57 Anastasia Baryshnikova < >> asia.baryshnikova@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've investigated the issue but I don't seem to be able to find a >> solution. I have an online dictionary where every term is linked to >> abbreviations, definitions and translations in other languages. How do I >> annotate them with microdata? >> The closest thing I can think of is make every term a CreativeWork, with >> inLanguage property. But how do i link 2 terms that are translations of >> each other? >> >> Thanks a lot in advance! >> >> If you mean schema.org, there is not a lot of vocab for this kind of >> thing yet. But you might read around Wordnet in RDF e.g. starting at >> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ >> >> Dan >> >> >> Anastasia Baryshnikova >> Crossdictionary.com >> >> >> > > > -- > > *Bernard Vatant* > Vocabularies & Data Engineering > Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 > Skype : bernard.vatant > http://google.com/+BernardVatant > -------------------------------------------------------- > *Mondeca* > 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris > www.mondeca.com > Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > >
Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 10:03:27 UTC