- From: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:30:41 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <D1E22418-AFE1-4921-9B15-C48593820AB0@semaku.com>
I'll daresay that was the plan from Apple marketing folks all along ;) Regards, John On 10 Apr 2015, at 20:06, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes iPhone is now a brand. > > But it did not start off that way was my point. > > > Thad > +ThadGuidry > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:03 PM, John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com> wrote: > Hi Thad > > One might argue iPhone to be the brand. > > You may then have a hierarchy of schema:ProductModel (related via schema:isVariantOf) for example the 'base' iPhone 6 with variants of memory color etc. even those may have various manufacturing variants (different chipsets, firmware etc.). > > An actual individual phone can then be related to the precise model via schema:model as mentioned by Niklas. > > In some industries knowing the exact model can be very relevant due to manufacturing location which may affect export control regulations. > > Regards, > > John > > On 10 Apr 2015, at 17:05, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Niklas has another good approach. >> >> That is where you treat "The Fairphone" as the concept of "The 1st Fairphone Model". There might be further models later, or there may never be. >> >> Before iPhone 6 there was just the iPhone (1st gen) and it's productID was actually lowercase "iphone" >> >> >> Thad >> +ThadGuidry >> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: >> I would suggest to use instead productID >> >> but looks like we need to expand it's datatype ? >> >> the productID is reserved for exactly your case (hard linking an individualProduct to a "product group" or productID... >> however the problem is that the datatype is only text at the moment. >> >> >> Thad >> +ThadGuidry >> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> You could use sdo:model to link to a sdo:ProductModel, like: >> >> { >> "@id": "https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone", >> "@type": "ProductModel", >> "name": "The Fairphone" >> } >> >> { >> "@id": "https://graph.wwelves.org/704e3a57-c09e-4846-b27a-d31854096572" >> "@type": "IndividualProduct", >> "model": {"@id": "https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone"}, >> "name": "A Fairphone currently used by elf Pavlik", >> "serialNumber": "2092043924022" >> } >> >> Cheers, >> Niklas >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:39 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >> On 04/10/2015 04:27 PM, Thad Guidry wrote: >> > I would explain it as: >> > http://schema.org/Product is really "Product Category Offered". You could >> > also think "Product Class Offered" or "Product Group Offered" if it helps. >> > >> > beneath that you might have 5 laptops that you are offering to sell as a >> > product... so each one....is an http://schema.org/IndividualProduct >> > >> > Fairphone is definitely a http://schema.org/Product each individual one >> > (with it's unique IMEI code) is a http://schema.org/IndividualProduct >> > >> > You can also say: >> > http://schema.org/IndividualProduct can be registered by users using their >> > IMEI, Serial #, etc... something that uniquely ties that individual product >> > to that customer. >> > >> > Only put things that are individually unique for a particular IMEI, Serial >> > #, etc... against the http://schema.org/IndividualProduct >> > One thing that you can put against that http://schema.org/IndividualProduct >> > is actually a chipset firmware version ... because sometimes some folks get >> > version A1 and later on in production the rest of the users might be >> > getting version A2, etc... if you have that kind of data...that would go >> > under http://schema.org/IndividualProduct rather than saying ALL your >> > Fairphones have version A2 by putting ia firmware version under >> > http://schema.org/Product >> Thanks Thad, makes sense but I still don't find answer to my question. >> >> How exactly do I link an IndividualProduct >> { >> "@id": "https://graph.wwelves.org/704e3a57-c09e-4846-b27a-d31854096572" >> "@type": "IndividualProduct", >> "name": "A Fairphone currently used by elf Pavlik", >> "serialNumber": "2092043924022" >> } >> >> to the Product >> >> { >> "@id": "https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone", >> "@type": "Product", >> "name": "The Fairphone" >> } >> >> ? >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Thad >> > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:52 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < >> > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> Looking at >> >> * http://schema.org/Product >> >> "Any offered product or service. For example: a pair of shoes; a >> >> concert ticket; the rental of a car; a haircut; or an episode of a TV >> >> show streamed online." >> >> * http://schema.org/IndividualProduct >> >> "A single, identifiable product instance (e.g. a laptop with a >> >> particular serial number)." >> >> >> >> I struggle to understand how I can specify for IndividualProduct just >> >> URI of the relevant Product. For example >> >> >> >> { >> >> "@id": "https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone", >> >> "@type": "Product", >> >> "name": "The Fairphone" >> >> } >> >> >> >> { >> >> "@id": "https://graph.wwelves.org/704e3a57-c09e-4846-b27a-d31854096572" >> >> "@type": "IndividualProduct", >> >> "name": "A Fairphone currently used by elf Pavlik", >> >> "serialNumber": "2092043924022" >> >> } >> >> >> >> I understand that I could *duplicate* all the values of properties from >> >> * https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone >> >> on >> >> * https://graph.wwelves.org/704e3a57-c09e-4846-b27a-d31854096572 >> >> But I would prefer to just reference it by URI and if needed embed >> >> information about Product resource in document describing >> >> IndividualProduct resource. And the generic data about Product would >> >> keep https://www.fairphone.com/fairphone as its subject. >> >> >> >> Thank you for help with understanding how to do that, or pointing out >> >> flaws in my approach. >> >> >> >> Cheers! >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 18:31:17 UTC