- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:41:28 +0200
- To: Ramanathan V Guha <guha@google.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <97EE83C2-B1BD-4115-95CF-9B79C6595936@w3.org>
> On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:26 , Guha <guha@google.com> wrote: > > Wonderful :) > > guha Indeed... Ivan > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > Update: the group has been approved and created: > https://www.w3.org/community/schemaorg/ > > Do please join up if you're interested in the finer detail of > schema.org collaboration. We'll continue to to make heavy use of > Github for issue tracking (i.e. > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues ) and will also keep > public-vocabs in-the-loop, but once the new extensions model is > implemented (next week or so) I suggest using the Community Group as > the default schema.org mailing list rather than public-vocabs. > > As a reminder the next release of schema.org is codenamed sdo-gozer, > and the list of issues (63 open) currently tagged against it is at > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22sdo-gozer+release%22 > > We'll probably push a few of those open issues off into a subsequent > release so if you've opinions on the urgency or best resolution for > any of the issues listed, do jump in right away via Github. > > cheers, > > Dan > > On 31 March 2015 at 19:00, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > > A quick note about a proposed Community Group for Schema.org at W3C, > > and its relationship with this list. > > > > The public-vocabs list is nearly 4(!) years old already. Since late > > 2011 it has been framed as the mailing list for W3C's "Web Schemas" > > task force of the Semantic Web Interest Group (charter at > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/webschema.html). > > > > During these last years those of us in the schema.org project have > > used the Web Schemas group and the public-vocabs@w3.org list as the > > primary list for day-to-day schema.org discussions. We have > > experimented with various collaboration mechanisms during that time, > > most recently by moving to an opensource codebase and extensive use of > > Github [1]. As we prepare to launch the recently announced extensions > > mechanism [2] we have realised that there is a need for a more > > dedicated Schema.org-specific forum that can be used to coordinate and > > discuss schema.org extensions. > > > > Therefore I have just filed a proposal for a new W3C "Schema.org > > Community Group", described as follows: > > > > "The Schema.org Community Group provides a forum for discussing all > > changes, additions and extensions to schema.org. In addition to > > providing a public setting for the day to day operation of the > > project, it serves as the mechanism for reviewing extensions and as a > > liaison point for all parties developing independent extensions to the > > schema.org core." > > > > There is naturally some overlap with this broader public-vocabs group, > > but the idea is that we will migrate all the more intense and detailed > > schema.org collaboration discussions into the new Community Group > > (while continuing to rely on Github to bring structure to our > > discussions and sanity to our inboxes). > > > > I hope many of the regular contributors to public-vocabs discussions > > will join and continue in the CG, and that public-vocabs will continue > > in the role initially outlined, i.e. as a high level meeting place for > > all efforts to bring structured data schemas into the Web. > > > > It looks like we only need one more person to vote for the group (we > > have 4/5 already) before it will be brought into existence. Which > > reminds me to emphasise that W3C Community Groups in general provide a > > great mechanism for topical schema discussions, whether schema.org > > oriented (like BibExtend, [4]) or otherwise. I'll keep this list > > updated as things get set up... > > > > cheers, > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues > > [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Mar/0117.html > > [3] https://www.w3.org/community/blog/2015/03/31/proposed-group-schema-org-community-group/#comment-55733 > > https://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#schemaorg > > [4] https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/ > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 07:41:34 UTC