- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:50:28 +0530
- To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Hellow Peter thanks for sharing insights makes sense, but...... not sure I can see schema.org purely as vertical would have thought that vertical is 'domain oriented'' while horizontal is it applies across domains no? that may depend on a given worldview perhaps ? :-) PDM On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Hi Renato, > > The W3C in particular did not want to take on vertical vocabulary projects > in the past. Tim B-L emphasized in multiple talks that the W3C would like > to focus on developing ontology languages, and let industry develop > vertical solutions. (To me the examples you mentioned such as SKOS and > PROV are part of the language infrastructure.) > > schema.org is such a vertical solution based on the needs of large web > consumers. > > Best, > Peter > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 14:20:56 UTC