- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:08:16 +0100
- To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 September 2014 08:38, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > On 19 Sep 2014, at 22:40, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Martin and Thad. >> >> So... The rest of you looks at Product as if it is ProductOrService. >> >> In that case (see it coming?): How does the rest of you look at Service? >> > > I suppose that "Service" was once added for some specific, but maybe only hypothetical use-case by one of the sponsors of schema.org. I believe it came relatively late, in support of its subtype, http://schema.org/GovernmentService see http://blog.schema.org/2013/08/vocabulary-for-describing-civic-services.html see also https://web.archive.org/web/20131210070108/http://schema.org/Service Dan
Received on Saturday, 20 September 2014 08:08:46 UTC