> > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure that > the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered and > schema:typeOfGood? Shouldn't 'offers' be added to Service as well than? 2014-09-18 22:14 GMT+02:00 Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:15 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org < > martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > >> > and maybe while on it, for schema:itemOffered we could extend >> > schema:rangeIncludes with Service and Role ? >> > >> > :) >> > >> >> See above. We must do that. >> >> Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure that >> the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered and >> schema:typeOfGood? > > > I'll update the proposal and circulate that before putting together a pull > request. > > - Vicki > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > >
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 20:34:36 UTC