- From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 15:26:40 -0400
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2014 19:27:08 UTC
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > Liking the structure - a few comments: > > > - ItemList - I would have thought ‘creator' would be more generic than > ‘author’ > - Similarly ‘dateCreated’ instead of ‘datePublished’ > - ListItem - ‘positionBasis’ sounds like the already defined > ‘position’, however it would lead to an even more apparent naming > confusion between the potion oriented properties. > > > I suspect people are choosing "author" because they are thinking of the ItemList as a written work, and author is a more natural term there than author. > For the more creative lists I thing we will need a Type which has both > ItemList and CreativeWork - a ‘CreativeItemList’? > The purist in me dislikes hybrid types, but I am aware that they are a confusing for people not steeped in data schemas. My biggest goal is to preserve the model in use if possible while expanding the semantics as necessary. - Vicki Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2014 19:27:08 UTC