- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:12:39 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:08:55AM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > > >On 9/4/14, 8:36 AM, Dan Scott wrote: >>>How can we express that there is a PDF and an ODT of the same document? >> >>... thanks to the workExample / exampleOfWork properties that were >>recently added to schema.org, you can express those relationships. See >>https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/108 for a request to add >>examples for those properties to schema.org (where we express that there >>are both book editions and movie adaptations of a given novel). > > >My gut feeling is that PDF/ODT is not the same as a book and a movie >derived from the book. Would both be coded with workExample? Hmm, my gut feels differently than your gut. I would say yes, they would be coded with either or both of exampleOfWork and workExample. exampleOfWork: "A creative work that this work is an example/instance/realization/derivation of." Let's add LaTeX to the mix. If you are in the business of running a repository of open access scholarly articles, you might want to offer LaTeX, HTML, and PDF versions of each article. Each format would exist at a different URL*, and they are three different instances of the same creative work, right? * Well, okay, you could use content-negotiation to serve them up at the same URL, but that seems unlikely to occur on the normal web.
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 18:13:08 UTC