- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:43:05 +0100
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 20 October 2014 10:56, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > +1. > > Is it time to resurrect my FictionalThing Type proposal? > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/FictionalThing > > It was an attempt to introduce a simple way, through multi-typing, to > identify any Thing that could be fictional. These discussions often centre > around people/characters, but fictional-ness spreads way beyond people to > organisations, countries, planets, languages and lumps of rock. It included > a property to reference a [real] Thing that the fictional is a representation of. Could it make more sense to make this relational - fictionallyAbout or similar - so that the relevant CreativeWork is included in the description. This might make it easier to handle fictitious accounts of real world entities. --Dan
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 11:43:32 UTC