Re: VideoGame proposal from Thad Guidry on 2014-10-17 (public-vocabs@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:36:37 -0500
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Jerome Mourits <jmourits@google.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Yuliya Tikhokhod <tilid@yandex-team.ru>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAChbWaOG4paqMtqM25_CNJ2wX2e-jd=N-ojJMYLorDe_WP+EMg@mail.gmail.com>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca  ??

Not all characters in Fiction are Persons.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> On 17 October 2014 16:55, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we're more likely to put the 'fictionality' workload onto
> >> specific properties.
> >
> > Good luck with that, long term.
>
> If I write a movie plot featuring Robin Hood, Jesus Christ, Charles
> Darwin, Saint Nicholas and Sinterklaas ... isn't it easier to say
> they're all Person? What's the value in going through and putting them
> into 'real' and 'unreal' buckets? None of them are going to have SMS
> numbers or verified Twitter accounts.
>
> Dan
>



-- 
-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>

Received on Friday, 17 October 2014 16:37:06 UTC