- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:00:38 +0100
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Jerome Mourits <jmourits@google.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Yuliya Tikhokhod <tilid@yandex-team.ru>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 17 October 2014 16:55, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think we're more likely to put the 'fictionality' workload onto >> specific properties. > > Good luck with that, long term. If I write a movie plot featuring Robin Hood, Jesus Christ, Charles Darwin, Saint Nicholas and Sinterklaas ... isn't it easier to say they're all Person? What's the value in going through and putting them into 'real' and 'unreal' buckets? None of them are going to have SMS numbers or verified Twitter accounts. Dan
Received on Friday, 17 October 2014 16:01:06 UTC