- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:57:24 +0200
- To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Sam Goto <goto@google.com>
On 10/06/2014 07:20 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 06:26 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> On 6 October 2014 17:19, Sam Goto <goto@google.com> wrote:
>>>> thinking about current use of event/location on Action resources, i also
>>>> spotted example in http://schema.org/FollowAction
>>>>
>>>> <!-- John followed Steve on Twitter. -->
>>>> {
>>>> "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>>> "@type": "FollowAction",
>>>> "agent": {
>>>> "@type": "Person",
>>>> "name": "John"
>>>> },
>>>> "followee": {
>>>> "@type": "Person",
>>>> "name": "Steve"
>>>> },
>>>> "location": {
>>>> "@type": "Product",
>>>> "name": "Twitter"
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> which *violates rangeIncludes* of http://schema.org/location
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, good catch. That's a bug from early revisions: we debated this one for a
>>> few rounds but forgot to remove it. The thinking at the time was to use
>>> "instrument" (or a sub-property-of like "product") to model things like
>>> "what application you used to perform the action". Makes sense?
>>
>> Someone care to file another pull request? :)
> i plan to just add another commit to pending PR once we clarify more
> details... i explicitly asked not to merge that PR yet for that very
> reason :)
> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/15
now it has 5 commits with 27 changes (22 in examples and 5 in schema)
i can move last 4 items on todo checklist (less obvious ones) to
separate issue(s) after you merge this PR :)
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 20:59:36 UTC