Re: Action subtypes, their properties & sub-properties plus relationships with Place & Event

On 10/06/2014 06:26 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 6 October 2014 17:19, Sam Goto <goto@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:20 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
>> <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/01/2014 06:18 PM, Sam Goto wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:51 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
>>>> <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org <mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>     In general I think that clear examples of various common cases can
>>>> come
>>>>     of more use then trying to nail down descriptions of all those
>>>>     properties!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1, I totally agree. Send a patch?
>>> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/15
>>>
>>> so far just single commit which makes examples using object in more
>>> consistent way
>>>
>>> thinking about current use of event/location on Action resources, i also
>>> spotted example in http://schema.org/FollowAction
>>>
>>> <!-- John followed Steve on Twitter. -->
>>> {
>>>   "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>>   "@type": "FollowAction",
>>>   "agent": {
>>>     "@type": "Person",
>>>     "name": "John"
>>>   },
>>>   "followee": {
>>>     "@type": "Person",
>>>     "name": "Steve"
>>>   },
>>>   "location": {
>>>     "@type": "Product",
>>>     "name": "Twitter"
>>>   }
>>> }
>>>
>>> which *violates rangeIncludes* of http://schema.org/location
>>
>>
>> Ah, good catch. That's a bug from early revisions: we debated this one for a
>> few rounds but forgot to remove it. The thinking at the time was to use
>> "instrument" (or a sub-property-of like "product") to model things like
>> "what application you used to perform the action". Makes sense?
> 
> Someone care to file another pull request? :)
i plan to just add another commit to pending PR once we clarify more
details... i explicitly asked not to merge that PR yet for that very
reason :)
https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/pull/15

Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 17:22:46 UTC