Re: New schema.org release (sdo-venkman) candidate for review

Coming out of ³lurk² to say +1


On 11/18/14, 1:56 PM, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote:

>Sad to see FictionalThing didn¹t make the cut - again :-(
>
>~Richard
>
>On 17 Nov 2014, at 19:07, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>> 
>> Short version: we think we're pretty much done with a new release, see
>> http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-venkman
>> 
>> 
>> Followers of schema.org may have noticed that we haven't made a new
>>release
>> of the site since mid-September. However if you have been following
>>along on
>> Github you'll notice that we have been busy integrating quite a few
>>proposals
>> and fixes. These are available in Git and as a test site as
>>"sdo-venkman"(*).
>> 
>> Pending changes are recorded in docs/releases.html:
>> 
>> http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-venkman
>> 
>> The underlying schemas, examples, code all lives in Github at:
>> 
>> https://github.com/danbri/schemaorg/tree/sdo-venkman
>> 
>> There are still a few issues we hope to address before publishing these
>> changes, see https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues for details. In
>> particular, we expect to address
>>https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/issues/148
>> (VideoGameSeries). We also solicit advice on the proposed type for dated
>> monetary values - see
>> http://sdo-venkman.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#dated-money
>> ... as we are not sure whether DatedMoneyValue would be better than the
>> current proposal of DatedMoneyspecification. Former is shorter, latter
>>is closer
>> to some existing type names.
>> 
>> Comments are welcome as always here or in Github (file an issue there
>> for bugs or comment in an existing entry), or anywhere in the Web that
>> has a URL.
>> 
>> Since this update will cover a lot of topics, please  re-title the
>> mail thread to indicate more specific topics. This is a large set of
>>changes so
>> there are bound to be a few bugs. If we can steer comments towards
>>specifics
>> and away from re-opening design earlier discussions that would help in
>> getting these improvements published.
>> 
>> Many thanks for your perspective,
>> 
>> cheers,
>> 
>> Dan,
>> for schema.org.
>> 
>> 
>> (*)
>> Ghostbusters-based codenames let us choose version numbers later.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostbusters#Cast
>> (next release will be sdo-stantz...)
>> 
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 19:02:20 UTC