Re: action status type

On 11/02/2014 10:16 AM, James M Snell wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2014 9:48 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <
> <>> wrote:
>  >
>  > One very strange aspect of these documents is that they appear to be trying
> to create a formal model for activities.  However, they use quite a variety of
> semi-formal concepts for this purpose.  Why not just use a formal modelling
> system for this purpose?  You wouldn't have to use RDF or OWL if these systems
> are in a great disfavour in the working group.
>  >
>  >
> How is that strange? Especially given that defining a model for activities is
> precisely what the activity streams document does ;-). So far, a formal
> modeling system has not been necessary but some steps have been taken in that
> direction.

Well the strangeness is that it is very hard to figure out just what is 
supposed to be going on because the foundations are underdefined.

> - James


Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:27:18 UTC