W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2014

Re: offeredBy to supersede vendor, merchant, provider, seller, ?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:56:46 -0400
Message-ID: <53889C2E.2090208@openlinksw.com>
To: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 5/30/14 7:39 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
>> I guess that would sort of go for @seller as well. Although @merchant 
>> and @vendor could be considered the same as @seller (well, at least 
>> by me). Maybe merging those into one property would be better.
> That is fine for transactions that are commercially based.  There are 
> also offer types to lend, borrow, give where @seller etc., is not a 
> good fit.
> @offeredBy is suitably generic to handle all types of offer, and 
> maintain the relationship with the concept of Offer that Martin is 
> concerned about.
> ~Richard




Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 14:57:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:31 UTC