- From: Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 22:54:42 +0200
- To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFQgrbZCSU8wKzWX8oWAtfuBFAUnDQ22X_JvbjpQ4+BKnDesyg@mail.gmail.com>
I wonder, if the 'itemprop-reverse' addon for Microdata gets accepted, would this than suffice: <span itemprop-reverse="about" itemscope itemtype=" http://schema.org/VideoObject"> <link itemprop="embedURL" href=" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjC_dCvVB8s"> <meta itemprop="name" content="How to get a flat stomach? tummy tuck or exercise?"> ... </span> Because if so, than maybe we don't need to do anything at all. (thinking out loud, again) On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:45 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org < martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > I would not recommend using hasPart as a generic property for relatedness. > > > On 19 May 2014, at 22:38, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl> wrote: > > > It's more the other way around. So in this case I want to express the > main entity on a page, a MedicalProcedure, has a video giving additional > information about the procedure. Something like this: > > > > <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/MedicalProcedure"> > > <link itemprop="sameAs" href="http://www.freebase.com/m/01_mbc"> > > <span itemprop="name">Tummy Tuck</span> (<span > itemrop="alternatename">abdominoplasty</span>) > > <span itemprop="description">A Tummy Tuck, or abdominoplasty, is the > most effective way to...</span> > > <span itemprop="howPerformed">In summary the Tummy Tuck procedure > takes 3-4 hours of...</span> > > > > <span itemprop="hasPart" itemscope itemtype=" > http://schema.org/VideoObject"> > > <link itemprop="embedURL" href=" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjC_dCvVB8s"> > > <meta itemprop="name" content="How to get a flat stomach? tummy > tuck or exercise?"> > > ... > > </span> > > </div> > > > > I started this thread by suggesting to add @video to Thing but that > quickly evolved in the idea for a 'general' or 'related' property instead, > and then halted. > > > > Now I have a website where many MedicalProcedure, Service and Article > entities have additional videos about those entities, yet only Article has > properties like @associatedMediao and @video. Both MedicalProcedure and > Service do not have the properties to express this. Which still leaves me > questioning what I should if I do not want the VideoObject to be main > entity. > > > >
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 20:55:10 UTC