- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 17:27:21 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <537682B9.6050601@openlinksw.com>
On 5/16/14 2:50 PM, Dan Scott wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:32:05PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 5/16/14 1:27 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> On 16 May 2014 17:59, Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> Is this [1] the definition of an Email, or this just an error? >>> "An email message." >>> >>> Short and sweet. Is there more that you think it should usefully say? >>> >>> At this stage we have not got into the business of representing mail >>> headers, although that could turn out to be interesting. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >> But I am not seeing a single recognizable Email Message attribute, >> hence my question. Another route to my confusion is by using a CTRL+F >> (or Command F) sequence to search on the pattern: Email, there are >> only two hits: >> >> Thing > CreativeWork > *Email*Message >> An *email* message. >> >> The properties table doesn't have a single hit i.e., its basically >> describes a 'Creative Work' . >> >> Hoping this clarifies my concerns. > > This is a relatively common pattern in schema.org. The class name is used > to distinguish the instance from the more generic class, but there are > no special properties that are necessary beyond the parent class. > > Look at http://schema.org/docs/full.html and you can see there are many > classes that do not define new properties. > > I understand that. I just don't understand the following, which might be clear if expressed in Turtle Notation: ## Turtle Start ## <http://schema.org/EmailMessage#this> rdfs:subClassOf <http://schema.org/CreativeWork#this> . ## Turtle End ## Basically, <http://schema.org/EmailMessage#that> doesn't have a single distinguishing attribute that forms the basis the rdfs:subClassOf relation above. Alternatively, I could be safe to assume that the missing attribute is in the blurb above the properties table that reads: "..An email message..." . Put differently, the comment "An email message." and the "EmailMessage" label are the distinguishing attributes of this subClassOf schema:CreativeWork. Represented in Turtle Notation it implies: ## Turtle Start ## <http://schema.org/EmailMessage#this> rdfs:subClassOf <http://schema.org/CreativeWork#this> . <http://schema.org/EmailMessage#this> a owl:Class . <http://schema.org/EmailMessage#this> rdfs:label "EmailMessage" . <http://schema.org/EmailMessage#this> rdfs:comment "An email message". ## Turtle End ## If the above is accurate, could it be that it exists in RDFa embedded in this page? Or in the document <http://schema.org/docs/full.html> ? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 21:27:44 UTC