- From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:17:01 -0700
- To: phil.barker@hw.ac.uk
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMbipBu95r9ELY=FWEbsd9uAiSoJw96=G3QKaO1dmkmigWQxBw@mail.gmail.com>
Great stuff Phil. Note that in two places in the PDF you describe microdata attributes as *microformat* attributes: "... we may insert the microformat itemscope attribute...." "The microformat itemprop attribute is used to indicate...." On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the first real post to public-vocabs: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Sep/0001.html > On Jun 5, 2014 3:00 PM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not saying that you are saying anything wrong. I was just surprised. >> Does anyone know the actual situation? I was unable to find any >> announcement. >> >> I also note that the Infobox in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org >> lists W3C as an organizer for schema.org. This information was >> introduced by a Wes Turner on 27 May 2013, but there does not appear to be >> any source for the information. >> >> peter >> >> On 06/05/2014 11:42 AM, Phil Barker wrote: >> >>> On 05/06/14 19:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> >>>> Is W3C part of the schema.org initiative? >>>> >>>> >>> Sorry, my mistake. It'll be fixed tomorrow. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> peter >>>> >>>> >>>> On 06/05/2014 08:57 AM, Phil Barker wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all. >>>>> I hope you don't mind me using this list to advertise a briefing paper >>>>> which >>>>> aims to describe schema.org. I also invite comments and discussion on >>>>> how it >>>>> might be improved in future revisions. >>>>> >>>>> As part of our work for Creative Commons on managing the Learning >>>>> Resource >>>>> Metadata Initiative (LRMI), Cetis today publish a new technical >>>>> briefing paper >>>>> “What is schema.org?”. >>>>> >>>>> We often find that when explaining the technology approach of LRMI we >>>>> are >>>>> mostly talking about schema.org, so this briefing, which describes the >>>>> schema.org specification for a technical audience should be of >>>>> interest to >>>>> anyone thinking about implementing or using LRMI in a website or other >>>>> tool. >>>>> It should also be of interest to people who plan to use schema.org for >>>>> describing other types of resource. >>>>> >>>>> You can download the briefing from http://publications.cetis.ac. >>>>> uk/2014/960 >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, Phil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 19:17:29 UTC