- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:32:08 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <538CD138.7040901@openlinksw.com>
On 6/2/14 2:47 PM, Karen Coyle wrote: > What is worse in the situation Bernard describes is that the domain > name may be resold and re-used, but unrelated to the original > vocabulary. Although unlikely, some vocabulary items may resolve in > the future, but to something entirely unrelated. In that case, part of > the message needs to be something like: this has been determined to be > unresolvable; do not attempt resolution. > > kc <#this> . # Is implicit and as a consequence problematic, as per Bernard's situation. <#this> wdrs:describedby <SomeDocURL.ttl> . # is explicit and loosely coupled rather than implicit and tightly coupled. <SomeDocURL.ttl> xhv:describes <#this> . # is also explicit and loosely coupled rather than implicit and tightly coupled. An RDF processor [1] can make sense of implicit and explicit denotation and connotation. Links: [1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com:8000/vapour -- will make sense of RDF document content based on RDF relations i.e., it's coded to handle explicit and implicit relations in regards to HTTP URI based denotation and connotation. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 19:32:31 UTC