- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:33:58 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <538C7D46.1060502@openlinksw.com>
On 5/31/14 5:20 PM, Farhana Sarker wrote: > Hi, > I am Farhana Sarker, student in the University of Southampton. > I am keen to know the benefit of using schema.org over linked data technology in reusing or interoperability of data or vice versa. > Could you please help me in this regards? > > Best regards, > Farhana > > > Farhana, Schema.org is a collaboratively constructed vocabulary. Linked Data is about denoting (naming or referring to) entities *unambiguously* using HTTP URI so an entity name resolves to a description of its referent (i.e., what it denotes). With the above definitions in place, in regards to Schema.org and Linked Data, it so happens that Schema.org doesn't mandate *unambiguous* entity denotation. Thus, in the context of Schema.org, you can have an HTTP URI that denotes both a Entity and the Web Document (content can be of any format) that describes the aforementioned Entity [1][2]. Hope this helps. Links: [1] http://schema.org/Offer -- HTTP URI that denotes an entity [2] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/c/9DL64QR7 -- sample report from a utility (called Vapor) that attempts to makes sense (discern meaning) of what the HTTP URI above denotes. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 13:34:25 UTC