Re: Question about schema.org in a triple store?

The License should only apply to the Schema.org classes and properties, 
not to the content on your website. Don't you attribute already by using 
Schema.org classes i.e. itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"?

Technischer Leiter
Binarypark UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Erich-Weinert-Str. 1
03046 Cottbus
Tel +49 (0)355 692931
Fax +49 (0)355 694171
info@binarypark.org
http://binarypark.org

Am 16.07.2014 16:45, schrieb Thad Guidry:
> Kingsley is pretty much spot on.
>
> 1. Give attribution to Schema.org, could be as simple as an included 
> readme.txt that says "Thanks DanBri and Schema.org stakeholders! You 
> saved our asses on this project!" ...
> 2. Also you must provide a link to the Schema.org license: 
> http://schema.org/docs/terms.html  (somewhere, anywhere, in your 
> project, website, extended vocabulary, whatever, wherever) ... and ...
> 3. Document and share with the world in that same readme.txt or 
> website, or wherever, of any changes you may have made to Schema.org 
> vocabulary or developed extension / terms to the vocabulary that you 
> have made as well.
> 4. Your done !
>
> In fact... I would encourage the stakeholders and DanBri to actually 
> put something like those 4 steps into the Schema.org license link to 
> make it easy to understand for anyone unfamiliar with CC-BY-SA.
>
> +1 Make it easier for developers and contributors to actually DO the 
> Sharealike by providing some simple steps such as above !  Otherwise, 
> change the darn license to just CC-BY.
>
> -- 
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Kingsley Idehen 
> <kidehen@openlinksw.com <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 7/16/14 8:15 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
>     <mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
>
>         That is understood, but the key issue for some adopters seems
>         to be
>
>                 • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon
>         the material, you must distribute your contributions under the
>         same license as the original.
>
>         If you develop a commercial product or specificiation that
>         builds upon schema.org <http://schema.org>, thus binds you to
>         release the result under a Creative Commons
>         Attribution-ShareAlike license, too.
>
>         The question is what "remix, transform, or build upon the
>         material" means. For instance, if you add schema.org
>         <http://schema.org> markup to your HTML, does that mean that
>         your whole HTML page must be released the under a Creative
>         Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license?
>
>         There are potential implications that are problematic for
>         adopters of schema.org <http://schema.org>.
>
>         This is why GoodRelations uses the broader Creative Commons
>         Attribution 3.0 license, which just requires attribution.
>
>
>     +1
>
>     Ultimately, this issue always come back to the same issue of
>     Attribution.
>
>     You shouldn't reuse the creative works of others without
>     attribution, bottom line.
>
>     -- 
>     Regards,
>
>     Kingsley Idehen
>     Founder & CEO
>     OpenLink Software
>     Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>     Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
>     Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>     <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
>     Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
>     Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
>     LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>     Personal WebID:
>     http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
>
>
>