Re: Another example of Wikidata + schema.org for type enumerations

And which also is confusing in the case of multiple type entities in
Microdata.

I can imagine folks will write something like this:

<span itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product">
    <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/Service">
    ...
</span>

as opposed to:

<span itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Product
http://schema.org/Service">
    ...
</span>

Or is this something that should be accepted as correct markup?


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>wrote:

> Well for me the confusement started with a remark of GuHa: "additionalType
> == typeOf" (
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Oct/0136.html).
>
> Which got me to think that in case of additionalType one could write:
> <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/Type1
> http://schema.org/Type2">
>
> Although Stéphane's remark: "href can only include one single URI" and
> Martin's remark: "the type in here is a property value" do make perfect
> sense from an HTML perspective.
>
> Now I looked at Dan's link to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#A-href and
> I've also looked it up in the Microdata specifications (
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-microdata-20131029/#values) and one could
> argue that they do indicate a single URI. All be a bit technocratic. So IMO
> I think it would be a good thing it schema.org could explain this a bit
> more 'readable'.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is probably going to be a FAQ question over and over and over...so..
>>
>> We should probably annotate when something takes multiple values within
>> the schema somehow... hmmm.... something like... "only single value
>> allowed"  or  "doesn't support multiple values".
>>
>> Or is there already a hard and fast rule here in the schema... that only
>> Types can take multiple values ?
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> --
>> -Thad
>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
>>
>
>